Sioux Falls Feminists

"Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent!"
Quick Escape

Solitude by Megan Godtland

Good Advice is: Choose Your Man Carefully!

Be You by Megan Godtland

Feminists Stats

Quick Escape
Or use Ctrl-W

25 Women's Inequality News Articles
from 2019 1st Half
Click on the links below to get the full story from its source

3-9-19 How women are challenging Hungary's sexist politics
Anna Donáth spent her first night in police custody in December. Her phone and bag were missing, and she worried no one knew where she was. Donáth was arrested as she lead protestors through the streets of Budapest, who had gathered in opposition to a new overtime bill passed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his far-right government. "'Let's free Anna, let's free Anna,' they were shouting," Donáth, 31, says. "There were a couple of hundred people there." After hours sitting in a police cell, she realized she had nothing to fear. "It was phenomenal to suddenly know there was this community behind me," she says. The overtime bill, dubbed the "slave law" by critics, brought thousands out onto the streets. Budapest has seen its share of mass demonstrations but opposition parties rarely unite in protest. So when eight female politicians from all the opposition parties took to the stage, united against a government ruling, people took notice. In Hungary this was unprecedented. Their hope is that together they can build a credible opposition to Orbán and his powerful Fidesz party. But the number of women in Hungary's parliament is small and Orbán's popularity seems unchanged after almost nine years in power. The rallies began in furious opposition to a change in Hungary's overtime laws, which said that workers could be forced to work 400 hours of overtime — while giving employers up to three years to compensate employees. Legislators said the bill was a response to a labor crisis. But as the protests grew, the message changed from anti-labor laws to broadly anti-regime.

3-8-19 US women's national team take legal action over discrimination
All 28 members of the United States women's national team squad have begun legal action against the US Soccer Federation (USSF), just months before defending the Women's World Cup title. The discrimination lawsuit relates to equal pay and working conditions. Players - including Carli Lloyd and Megan Rapinoe - are urging the governing body to "promote gender equality". It follows a discrimination complaint made by five American players in 2016. The US have won the Women's World Cup three times - at the inaugural 1991 tournament in China, the 1999 event hosted by the US and then in Canada four years ago. The men's team made the quarter-finals in 2002, while their best finish remains the third place in 1930. The lawsuit, filed with the US District Court in Los Angeles, stated: "Despite the fact that these female and male players are called upon to perform the same job responsibilities on their teams and participate in international competitions for their single common employer, the USSF, the female players have been consistently paid less money than their male counterparts. "This is true even though their performance has been superior to that of the male players, with the female players, in contrast to male players, becoming world champions." (Webmaster's comment: So much for the superiority of the American male.)

3-8-19 Respect for U.S. Women Hit New Low Before Midterms
In the wake of the #MeToo movement and amid what many have dubbed, "the Year of the Woman," U.S. women were feeling less treated with respect and dignity in 2018 than at any point since 2011. A few months before a record number of women were elected to Congress last year, a record-low 48% of U.S. women believed women in the country are treated with respect and dignity. While women have typically been less likely than men to have the same opinion on how women are treated since Gallup started asking this question, the divide between men and women stretched to 22 percentage points in 2018. Although a banner year in Congress, it was also a tough year for U.S. women on a number of fronts. This poll was conducted Aug. 13-Sept. 30, 2018 -- before and during the first public hearing for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was accused of sexual misconduct. Men's views of how women in the U.S. are treated, on the other hand, haven't changed much. The seven in 10 U.S. men who said in 2018 that women are treated with respect and dignity is slightly down from peaks in 2011 and 2012, but attitudes have been mostly stable for the past several years.

  • Record-low 48% of U.S. women say women treated with respect, dignity
  • Gap between men and women widens to 22 points
  • Majority of women see men treated better than women

3-8-19 More Seats for Women in the House, Not Enough at the Table
Record-high numbers of women ran for office at all levels of government in the 2018 U.S. midterm elections. Women were particularly successful in the congressional elections, with the total number of women in the House of Representatives rising to 102, and to 25 in the Senate -- both all-time highs. Despite these successes, Gallup polling after the midterms found significant room for improvement, particularly in women's perceptions of their own status in society. A record-low 46% of women in the U.S. reported feeling satisfied with "the way women are treated in society," while 52% reported feeling dissatisfied. This marked a 15-percentage-point drop in satisfaction from 2016, before President Donald Trump's election. A second poll in early 2019 asking about "the position of women in the nation" found somewhat more positive results -- although only slightly more than half of women (57%) said they were satisfied with women's position, while a sizable 41% said they were dissatisfied. Increased concerns about how women are treated in the climate of the Trump administration, the #MeToo movement and other factors likely contributed to the "pink wave" that swept a number of long-term male incumbents out of office. This includes the victories of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

3-8-19 International Women's Day: Trail-blazing women of Kew
London in 1896, and a curious turn of history. Women gardeners were employed for the first time at Kew, and on equal pay, decades before women gained the vote. Made to wear the same garb as male gardeners so as not to distract their colleagues, their brown woollen bloomers soon made the news. As the satirical magazine, Punch, put it, "They gardened in bloomers the newspapers said. So to Kew without waiting all Londoners sped." After a blaze of publicity, the powers that be changed their minds and skirts were reinstated. Now, more than a century on, Kiri Ross-Jones, archivist and records manager at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, reflects on the trail blazers of Kew. She says it's incredible that at this point in time, women were in horticultural employment. "They worked long days, there was a lot of physical work involved in it - and also the studying side of it as well - these women were studying in organic chemistry and physics as well as botany and horticulture. "And I think it's just amazing that at this point in time these women were doing that here at Kew." Annie Gulvin, Alice Hutchings, Gertrude Cope and Eleanor Morland, who trained together at Swanley Horticultural College, became the first female gardeners at Kew. Their days were long, digging in the dirt from 6am to 6pm in the summer months. They were expected to spend their evenings attending lectures or studying in the library. "As far as we can tell, the women were employed on exactly the same terms as the men - and they appear to have been paid the same salary - it was quite a low salary for that day - but it was, as far as we can tell, exactly the same as the male gardeners," says Kiri Ross-Jones. (Webmaster's comment: At this time in America we were still beating our wives into submission.)

3-7-19 Cern cuts ties with 'sexist' scientist Alessandro Strumia
The European particle physics research centre Cern has cut ties with the scientist who said that women were less able at physics than men. Cern has decided not to extend Professor Alessandro Strumia’s status of guest professor. The decision follows an investigation into comments, first reported by BBC News, made by Prof Strumia at a Cern workshop on gender equality. Prof Strumia told BBC News that he stood by his remarks. "Some people hated hearing about higher male variance: this idea comes from Darwin, like other offensive ideas that got observational support," he told BBC News. "Science is not about being offended when facts challenge ideas held as sacred". He added that he believed that he had not been fairly treated. "For months, Cern kept 'investigating' if my 30-minute talk might have violated Cern rules [requiring an] 'obligation to exercise reserve and tact in expressing personal opinions and communication to the public'," Prof Strumia said. "In such a case, they would have opened some procedure, where I would have been able [to defend] myself. This never happened." Last September, Professor Strumia stated that “physics was invented and built by men, it's not by invitation" at a presentation at the Cern the workshop. He also showed cartoons deriding women campaigning for equality in science and presented the results of an analysis that he claimed showed that work conducted by female physicists was not as good as their male counterparts. His analysis was quickly dismissed as being unscientific and incorrect by experts in the impact of research.

3-6-19 UN rights chief Bachelet warns of threat from 'gross inequality'
The UN human rights chief has warned of the threat posed by growing global inequality over income, wealth and access to resources and justice. "In recent months we have seen people across the world take to the streets to protest," said Michelle Bachelet. Addressing the UN Human Rights Council, Ms Bachelet referred specifically to a recent wave of protests in Sudan, as well as protests in Haiti and France. She also warned of the "existential threat" of hate speech and xenophobia. Ms Bachelet expressed concern that the demands of citizens protesting against inequality were being met by "violent and excessive use of force, arbitrary detentions, torture and even alleged summary or extrajudicial killings". "In Sudan, for the past several months, people protesting harsh economic conditions and bad governance have been violently dispersed by security forces, sometimes using live ammunition," she said. Ms Bachelet singled out Venezuela as an example of how "violations of civil and political rights" can accentuate inequality and worsening economic conditions. She also criticised Israel over its blockade of Gaza, and said she regretted Israel's "immediate dismissal" of a report by a UN Human Rights Council commission of inquiry, "without addressing any of the very serious issues raised". UN experts said last week that Israeli security forces might have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity while responding to weekly mass Palestinian protests along the Gaza-Israel border last year. The experts investigated the deaths of 189 Palestinians and said they found reasonable grounds to believe that Israeli snipers had shot at children, medics and journalists, even though they had been clearly recognisable as such.

3-3-19 The journey towards gender equality in Saudi Arabia
Last year, the ban on women driving was lifted. But there's still a long way to go. ast summer, when Sharia Walker got behind the wheel for the first time in Saudi Arabia, the reactions she encountered surprised her. "Guys honk their horns and give me a thumbs-up," she said recently, during her 25-minute commute home from work in her gray, Toyota Camry. "[There were] five kids packed up in a car, and they're all peering through the window and waving like they've seen a celebrity or something." Walker was treated like a celebrity because the kingdom had just lifted its decades-old ban on women driving. "I never in a thousand years imagined that one day, it would be possible for me to get behind the wheel and drive myself home. The status quo had been set in place for so long," said Walker, who lives in Jeddah. The lifting of the ban has improved life for some Saudi women like Walker — they can get themselves to work or even take a job that involves lots of driving — while others say they are ambivalent about it or would rather women stay off the roads. The change has also come at great cost for activists who began fighting for this cause back in the 1990s. Until last summer, Saudi Arabia was the only country in the world where women weren't allowed to drive, a policy that had been in place since 1957. The ban's origins are murky, but the country follows Wahhabism, a strict form of Sunni Islam, which, among other things, forbids the sexes to mix. Saudi clerics argued that allowing women to drive would lead to promiscuity. But in September 2017, Saudi Arabia's ruler, King Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, issued a decree announcing that the nation's women could drive starting on June 24, 2018. This was an extraordinary moment for women in the kingdom. Many had long fought for that right. Some analysts view this change as a direct result of the crown prince's vision to revamp the economy. In 2016, only one in five Saudis employed in the kingdom were women — extremely low compared to other parts of the world. The ban has been widely condemned as a major barrier against women's empowerment in the kingdom and a symbol of oppression. Some rights organizations hoped the ban's removal would lead to more action on gender equality in Saudi Arabia. But last May, in the lead-up to the lifting of the ban, more than a dozen female activists who had pushed for the right to drive were rounded up and put in jail. At least nine of them remain in prison. Families of the activists say they have been tortured and put in solitary confinement for long periods. No formal charges have been brought against the women, only a series of allegations that accused them of having been involved in a foreign plot against the government. "We have received reports that several activists including women's rights activists were tortured, ill-treated, and sexually abused during the first three months of their detention," said Dana Ahmed, Middle East and Gulf researcher for Amnesty International. "Several activists reported that activists received electric shocks, were flogged and beaten and one activist wasn't able to stand or walk properly according to her family who saw her."

3-1-19 A woman’s place in the courtroom
Women lawyers are caught in a double bind, said Lara Bazelon. They have to battle sexism from judges and other litigators, but can’t risk alienating a jury when a client’s life and liberty are at stake. Last year, Elizabeth Faiella took a case representing a man who alleged that a doctor had perforated his esophagus during a routine medical procedure. Before the trial began, she and the defense attorney, David O. Doyle Jr., were summoned to a courtroom in Brevard County, Fla., for a hearing. Doyle had filed a motion seeking to “preclude emotional displays” during the trial—not by the patient, but by Faiella. “Counsel for the Plaintiff, Elizabeth Faiella, has a proclivity for displays of anguish in the presence of the jury, including crying,” Doyle wrote in his motion. Faiella’s predicted flood of tears, he continued, could be nothing more than “a shrewdly calculated attempt to elicit a sympathetic response.” The judge denied Doyle’s request, saying, in essence, “I expect both parties to behave themselves.” Afterward, Faiella confronted Doyle in the hallway. “Why would you file such a thing?” she demanded, noting that it was unprofessional, sexist, and humiliating. “I don’t understand why you are getting so upset,” she says Doyle replied. (Doyle denied that gender was the motivating factor behind filing the motion; he said he had filed such motions against male attorneys as well.) When I asked Faiella for a copy of Doyle’s motion, she said that she could send me examples from more than two dozen cases across her 30-year career. She said that at least 90 percent of her courtroom opponents are male and that they file a “no-crying motion” as a matter of course. Judges always deny them, but the damage is done: The idea that Faiella—who told me “I have never cried in a trial. Not once”—will unfairly deploy her feminine wiles to get what she wants has been planted in the judge’s mind. Though Faiella has long since learned to expect the motions, every time one crosses her desk she feels sick to her stomach. “I cannot tell you how much it demeans me,” she said. “Because I am a woman, I have to act like it doesn’t bother me, but I tell you that it does. The arrow lands every time.” For the past two decades, law schools have enrolled roughly the same number of men and women. In 2016, for the first time, more women were admitted to law school than men. In the courtroom, however, women remain a minority, particularly in the high-profile role of first chair at trial. In a landmark 2001 report on sexism in the courtroom, Deborah Rhode, a Stanford law professor, wrote that women in the courtroom face what she described as a “double standard and a double bind.” Women, she wrote, must avoid being seen as “too ‘soft’ or too ‘strident,’ too ‘aggressive’ or ‘not aggressive enough.’” If the courtroom were merely another place where the advancement of women has been checked, that would be troubling, if not entirely surprising. But the stakes in the courtroom aren’t just a woman’s career development and her earning potential. The interests—and, in the criminal context, the liberty—of her client are also on the line.

3-1-19 Feminine job titles get go-ahead in France
Decades after other French-speaking countries adopted feminine names for professions, the official guardians of the language in France have also backed the change. The Académie française, whose members are known as "immortals", has said it has no obstacle in principle to such a "natural evolution" of French. Feminine forms for jobs like prosecutor or firefighter are already often used. But until recently the academy objected to such changes as "barbaric". (Webmaster's comment: The only thing barbaric is many men's neverending hatred of women!) In its report it said "the academy considers that all developments aiming at recognising in language the place of women in today's society can be foreseen, as long as they do not contravene the elementary and fundamental rules of language". It will now accept, for example, professeure for a woman teacher instead of the masculine professeur. But the male-dominated body, which dates back to the 17th Century, said it would not draw up an "exhaustive list" of names, accepting that it would be an insurmountable task. It pointed out that several feminine versions of auteur (author) had already come into usage, including auteure, autoresse and autrice. Some French jobs already have feminine forms such as infirmière (nurse) but the vast majority of job titles are masculine. The feminine definitive article is commonly used to distinguish between sexes, for example la juge (judge) or la ministre (minister). Any changes may simply be a matter of making formal a job title that already exists. Some will just have an extra "e" as a suffix and maybe an accent, such as préfète (prefect), députée (MP) avocate (lawyer) and procureure (prosecutor). Then there is sapeuse-pompière (firefighter) rather than sapeur-pompier. Other francophone countries such as Belgium, Switzerland and Luxembourg as well as the Canadian province of Quebec already have feminine forms for jobs. (Webmaster's comment: But not in the United States. Men want to keep women subordinate!)

2-28-19 Should the government really make parenting 'easy'?
This can't be the goal of family policy. Americans seem to be in a mood nowadays to throw money at families. It's an appealing prospect for me, as a mother of five young kids. I want a pony! At least, my kids would definitely like to have a pony. Ponies are not at the center of most family-policy debates. They focus on more practical things: paid family leave, free maternity care, free day care, or just more money for families, funneled through expanded tax credits or child allowances. At the moment the day-care issue is front and center of our political debate. Matt Bruenig has gone a step further though with his "People's Policy Project," releasing a comprehensive proposal detailing all the benefits he thinks families need. Bruenig's "Family Fun Pack" smartly draws together different ideas from the family-policy debate, advancing them all under a single rationale. Under his proposal, all expectant parents in America could look forward to "baby boxes," paid parental leave, free day care, universal pre-K, complimentary school lunches, free health care, and a monthly child allowance that would extend until their child reaches adulthood. It's a comprehensive package meant to ensure that every child has everything he might need, without parents being called upon to make Herculean sacrifices. You could view this as a way to boost birth rates, which has been a topic of increasing concern in most Western countries of late. Bruenig doesn't really stress that angle, since he's more concerned with the problem of material inequality. Children typically don't earn money, and they're also a major drain on their parents' resources. The Family Fun Pack is pitched as a measure that could alleviate these inequities, making parenthood "easy and affordable" for everyone. Let's pause right there. Parenthood should be "easy and affordable"? For the moment, put aside whether the state should take on massive new spending commitments when we're already $22 trillion in debt. Even supposing the finances were manageable, do we really want to pitch the idea that swinging into parenthood should rightly be a no-stress kind of deal?

2-27-19 In 1959 a Swiss referendum denied women the right to vote
In 1959 Switzerland held a referendum on whether women should be allowed to vote in general elections. Only men could take part in the referendum and two-thirds of them voted no. Swiss women eventually won the right to vote in 1971. Ruth Dreifuss campaigned for women's rights as a 19-year-old during the 1959 referendum, and was instrumental in getting women elected to parliament in 1971. She later became the first female president of Switzerland.

2-22-19 Women's Inequality
In 2017, a higher percentage of American women had four or more years of college education (34.6 percent) than men (33.7 percent). Women, however, still lagged men in workforce participation, with 56.9 percent for females and 69.2 percent for males. There’s only one woman for every 21 men in the top 1 percent of earners. Even though most college graduates are women, only 4.5 percent of them make it into the highest income tier, in which household earnings are greater than $845,000. Among married top-percentile households, the woman’s income was needed to make the threshold only 15 percent of the time. (Webmaster's comment: They also lag males in compensation by over 20%.)

2-22-19 Why women-only spaces still matter
"What do you think of the Boy Scouts admitting girls?" It was the last day of The Compact, a California-based feminist summer camp for women and gender-variant adults, which I was attending. A half-dozen of us sat chatting around a picnic bench, enjoying the sun filtering through the redwoods. As the question hung in the air, there were sighs, groans, eye-rolls. The consensus was clear: "Just don't mess with the Girl Scouts. Please." As of this month, the Boy Scouts of America is being officially rebranded as Scouts BSA. Since this shift was first announced in fall 2017, much of the national conversation has focused on a supposed rivalry with Girl Scouts USA. With a national scouting organization accepting both boys and girls, the implication goes, is an all-girls counterpart still needed? My own Girl Scout career was short and unenthusiastic. It lasted less than a year; I don't recall if I even got a vest. But in recent years, I've come to crave the company of other women. The Compact, for me, was a chance to recapture some of what I missed out on in my youth, and a searing reminder of the importance of women-only spaces. Privilege has a gravitational pull. Those who possess it become the center of any interaction in which they are present. When a man enters a room full of women, his experiences and viewpoints immediately define the conversation. Instinctively, unconsciously, the women in the room step back. They moderate their words. They watch for signs of discomfort and rush to soothe hurt feelings. For many of us, this is the natural outcome of a lifetime of training. Girls learn to defer to boys, let boys behave as they will, cushion boys' feelings, and soften boys' falls. We learn to be calm, likable, pliable; we learn to doubt our own instincts and neglect our own needs in order to smooth the way for others. When we experience mistreatment and violence, we learn to blame ourselves. Women-only spaces offer a respite from the pressure — and, often, trauma — wrought by that social conditioning. By temporarily removing cisgender men from the equation, organizations like Girl Scouts USA and The Compact allow women to put our own experiences front and center. When I was an adolescent, that felt transgressive and uncomfortable. As an adult, it feels like a lifeline.

2-7-19 Don’t believe women in science face huge inequality? Here’s the proof
Scientists read and react to peer reviewed research, making the pages of leading scientific journals like The Lancet a good venue to fight for gender equity, says Jessica Wade. What’s the best way to tackle the equality and inclusivity problems in science? In a special publication of The Lancet, researchers are doing it with data. It couldn’t be more timely: from the gender pay gap to #MeToo, women are making their voices heard. The special issue is intersectional – it doesn’t only focus on gender, but considers its interplay with other protected characteristics. As a woman in physics, I am all too familiar with the challenges of working in a male-dominated profession. Seeing many of those obstacles set out formally in print really hammers home how much work still needs to be done. In The Lancet special issue we learn that, as a woman scientist, there are subtle biases at work in your medical education (78 per cent of the faces in medical textbooks are male), your success in securing academic funding (12.7 per cent success rate for men applying to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 8.8 per cent for women applicants to the same body), and even your chances of being invited to peer-review the work of other scientists (74 per cent of the peer-reviewers for The Lancet are men). One of the new papers – co-authored by Esther Choo at the Oregon Health and Science University –should be a wake-up call to academic departments trying to reform their workplace culture. It outlines succinctly the obstacles responsible for inequity: “a punitive environment for whistle-blowers; minimal consequences for perpetrators of harassment or discrimination; and absence of standardised approaches”.

2-6-19 State of the Union: Democratic women cheer at Trump speech
President Trump and Democratic women share an unexpected moment of unity during his State of the Union speech. The female Democrats were dressed in white to highlight equal rights, 100 years after Congress agreed to give US women the right to vote.

2-1-19 Women in film: 'We're living in the dark ages when it comes to representation'
The movies that made the most money in 2018 - such as Black Panther, Avengers: Infinity War, Incredibles 2 - were all directed by men. That's the norm when it comes to Hollywood's biggest films, according to US campaign group, Time's Up. They've shared figures which reveal only 4% of the biggest earning films from the past decade have been directed by women. And now they're calling on Hollywood studios and stars to change that. Time's Up has launched the #4percentchallenge, and stars Tessa Thompson, Brie Larson and Bryce Dallas Howard are among the names to lend their support. Time's Up's campaign to draw attention to this inequality has been welcomed by rising female film talent here in the UK. "Four percent is a pretty depressing figure, but things like this challenge are absolutely necessary," British director Georgia Parris told Radio 1 Newsbeat. She premiered her first full-length film, Mari, at the BFI Film Festival. "It's that age-old problem that women are hired on experience and men are hired on potential. "So if we're not being given the opportunities to gain that experience then how is the problem ever going to change?" But she says the success of 2017's Wonder Woman is an early sign that things are starting to change. "I think there's a sense that women tend to direct sensitive, female-based issue films but these are the ones that tend to cost less money," she adds. "But you look at something like Wonder Woman and that's done hugely well."We're starting to see those snippets of women being trusted with bigger budgets."

1-28-19 UAE mocked over gender balance awards tweet featuring only men
The UAE has been mocked over a tweet announcing the winners of awards for gender balance that featured only men. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai's ruler, was shown congratulating the recipients of Best Personality Supporting Gender Balance, Best Federal Authority Supporting Gender Balance, and Best Gender Balance Initiative. The sheikh insisted women were "central to shaping the future of the country". But many Twitter users questioned their apparent absence from the ceremony. A later tweet by the Government of Dubai Media Office included a photograph showing five women standing beside Sheikh Mohammed and the male recipients, but it did not identify them. A statement by the official Dubai Media Office meanwhile cited Sheikha Manal bint Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, president of the UAE Gender Balance Council, as saying it had achieved a goal set in 2015 to reduce the gender gap across all sectors of government. In April, the UAE cabinet approved legislation to ensure equal pay for women. But last month the country was ranked 121st out of 149 countries overall in the World Economic Forum's 2018 Global Gender Gap Report and 134th in terms of economic participation and opportunity.

1-25-19 High school valedictorians
About 70 percent of high school valedictorians in recent years have been girls.

1-21-19 Sexism row over German charity event
A row over sexism has broken out in the German port city of Bremen, after a prestigious charity event refused to invite the co-mayor because she is a woman. The Eiswette (Ice Bet) club hosts a black-tie dinner each January, among the many more colourful events that make up the popular festival, to raise money for the country's maritime search and rescue service, the local Weser Kurier newspaper reports. Germany's great and good, along with their foreign guests, turn up in their hundreds to bet on when the ice on the River Weser will break - but only if they are men. The gala dinner has been an exclusively male preserve for 190 years. But this year it faced a dilemma on Saturday when the city's main mayor, Senate President Carsten Sieling, bowed out in order to attend the funeral of Pawel Adamowicz, the murdered mayor of Gdansk in Poland. The Social Democrat mayor nominated his female co-mayor, Finance Senator Karoline Linnert, from the governing coalition's Greens junior partner, to attend in his place. But the Eiswette refused to break with tradition, and allocated the place to the mayor of neighbouring Bremerhaven, who happens to be a man. Ms Linnert did not hide her disgust. "The gentlemen of the Eiswette set great store by etiquette. But protocol suddenly doesn't matter any more when - how awful! - the official substitute for the male mayor of Bremen turns out to be the female mayor of Bremen," the Green politician posted on Facebook. She was particularly offended that, in the year when Germany is celebrating 100 years of women having the vote, "the Eiswette still thinks it right to exclude women under cover of tradition," but wished the men a pleasant evening anyway.

1-18-19 Women deserve equal rights
It’s time for Saudi Arabia to abolish the “wrong and discriminatory” practice of male guardianship, said Faisal Abbas. The system, which requires women to get a male relative’s permission to work, travel abroad, or even leave the house, didn’t become codified until the Islamic revival of the 1980s, and today many Saudi men—even conservatives like me—find it “outdated.” Our society is now undergoing “massive and rapid changes,” in line with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s “Vision 2030” plan for the future. Not only are women now allowed to drive, they have also “been granted the right to work in almost all sectors.” In most public places, segregation of the sexes is ending. For the first time in 35 years, cinemas are opening. Even our dress code has become “far more relaxed.” Women can choose for themselves whether to wear the face-covering niqab, the hair-covering hijab, “or neither.” Critics may cavil that the Saudi feminist activists who advocated for the lifting of the driving ban were jailed last year. But if the security forces acted improperly, “I am fully confident that they will face justice.” The signs are clear. “Whatever is left of the male guardianship system will be abolished—by default—sooner rather than later.”

1-6-19 How Serena Williams inspired new rules in tennis
Serena Williams, previously ranked No. 1 by the Women's Tennis Association, has won a different type of victory: The WTA recently announced changes to the rules about tennis players' dress and rank — partly in response to what Williams went through when she returned to the tennis court after her maternity leave. The debate began when French Tennis Federation judge Bernard Giudicelli called out Williams after the French Open — a tournament she's won three times — for wearing a black bodysuit, otherwise known as the "catsuit." Guidicelli was quoted in Tennis Magazine as saying the outfit "will no longer be accepted. One must respect the game and the place." That statement didn't go down so well. Some fellow players and fans called the comments sexist and racist. Williams' catsuit had been inspired by the "Black Panther." She told The Guardian it made her feel like a "warrior princess," like in the movie. It turns out the black bodysuit Williams wore to work that day also had a practical purpose: Williams suffered blood clots after giving birth in 2017, and the leggings helped with circulation. Stephanie Myles, a sportscaster and editor for Tennis.Life, said that "with the compressive elements to the outfit, she could probably even get away with wearing it [to] Wimbledon, where they are far more strict, if she could prove that she needs it for medical reasons." Now, other players won't have to make that argument. The Women's Tennis Association put out a statement last month saying that wearing leggings and compression shorts without shorts or a skirt over them is totally acceptable. It turns out there was never a rule against it. And Myles says forget the fashion statement — it just makes sense. "Not everywhere they play is warm and sunny," she explained. "And so, they sometimes play late at night where it gets cold." Players get cold. Leggings keep the muscles warm. Doubles champion Pam Shriver also thinks the rule change makes sense. Shriver played from 1978 to 1997. She never wore a catsuit on the court but she did get reprimanded one time for a clothing violation. "I couldn't be bothered leaving the court," she said. "I didn't need to go to the toilet. I had [a] jog bra on, and I just changed my shirt." She didn't know changing her shirt on the court was against the rules. "I mean, eventually you realize there's rules and guidelines in sports that are just outdated. So, that was one," she said. That rule was changed the next day. (Webmaster's comment: Fighting against the male brute bullshit rules is a moral imperative!)

1-4-19 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Lawmaker mocks college dance critics
In the eyes of some social media critics the United States' youngest-ever congresswoman can do no right. To a lengthy list of past misdemeanours, including her clothes and not being rich, can now be added the grievous crime of dancing while in college. A day before Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was officially sworn-in, near decade-old footage of the congresswoman dancing as a student at Boston University re-emerged on Twitter, apparently in an effort to embarrass her. On Friday Ms Ocasio-Cortez posted a new video of her dancing outside her new office in the halls of Congress to the tune of War by Edwin Starr. "I hear the GOP thinks women dancing are scandalous. Wait till they find out Congresswomen dance too!" she wrote, referring to the Republican Party. The original post has been viewed more than 8 million times. Here is America's favourite commie know-it-all acting like the clueless nitwit she is," one right-wing Twitter account, @AnonymousQ1776, wrote as they shared the clip. The account, which appears to reference the bizarre QAnon conspiracy theory, has since been removed. "After Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is forced out of office after one term she can go dance on a stage that has a pole," said another. But the criticism prompted a much larger wave of support for the congresswoman online. "[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] is officially done," comedian Patton Oswalt joked. "She'll never recover from the world seeing her dancing adorably and having fun with her friends." "I want Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to give me dance lessons," Star Trek actor George Takei tweeted, while actor Russell Crowe declared her "fantastic". The video of Ms Ocasio-Cortez was compiled from a longer video featuring Boston University students. The video was posted to YouTube in 2010, when Ms Ocasio-Cortez was an undergraduate.The video was part of a meme circulating at the time.v Participants, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other students at Boston University, emulated the dance from 1980s movie The Breakfast Club in a mash-up featuring the song Lisztomania, by French indie band Phoenix. (Webmaster's comment: Women can never do right according to the white male brutes!)

1-3-19 Sabarimala: India's Kerala paralysed amid protests over temple entry
Schools across the state are closed and public transport too has been suspended. One person was killed in clashes on Wednesday. The Sabarimala temple was historically closed to women of "menstruating age" - defined as between 10 and 50. The Supreme Court revoked the ban in September, which prompted outrage. On Wednesday, Bindu Ammini, 40, and Kanaka Durga, 39, entered the shrine around dawn and became the first women to do so. Schools across the state are closed and public transport too has been suspended. One person was killed in clashes on Wednesday. The Sabarimala temple was historically closed to women of "menstruating age" - defined as between 10 and 50. The Supreme Court revoked the ban in September, which prompted outrage. On Wednesday, Bindu Ammini, 40, and Kanaka Durga, 39, entered the shrine around dawn and became the first women to do so. Thursday saw a second day of protests across the state. Right-wing groups, supported by India's ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), demanded a state-wide shutdown. They wanted schools, colleges and businesses to remain closed as a sign of protest. The state government, which supports the Supreme Court ruling, stepped up security and deployed police across the state for protection. But fearing violence, schools and shops were closed. And buses did not run as protesters blocked highways and other roads. In total, more than 700 people were arrested on Wednesday and Thursday. Sixty police officers were injured, more than 80 public buses were damaged and at least a dozen police vehicles were attacked. (Webmaster's comment: Can it be true that religion is behind most violence? Seems to be.)

1-2-19 Sabarimala: Indian women make history by entering temple
Two Indian women have made history by entering a prominent Hindu shrine in the southern state of Kerala, following months of protests against their entry. The Sabarimala temple was historically closed to women of "menstruating age" - defined as between 10 and 50. The Supreme Court overturned that ban but protesters then attacked women and stopped them from going in. The women's entry to the shrine sparked fresh protests and police used tear gas at several locations in Kerala. Bindu Ammini, 40, and Kanaka Durga, 39, devotees of the temple deity, Lord Ayyappa, entered around dawn. "We arrived early in the morning and we had a darshan [saw the idol] for a few minutes," Ms Ammini told the BBC. Kerala's Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, whose government supports the Supreme Court ruling, told reporters that the women's entry into the temple was a historic moment. On 1 January, his left-wing coalition government organised a "women's wall" - in which women from across Kerala formed a 620km (385-mile) human chain to protest against the ban. Temple officials say the women have "defiled" the temple. It was closed for an hour in order to perform "purification rituals" but has now reopened. Demonstrations across the state have since erupted and police have fired tear gas to disperse crowds. Violent clashes have been reported outside the state parliament, according to local media. The ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has also called for a two-day protest after news of the women entering the shrine broke.

25 Women's Inequality News Articles
from 2019 1st Half

Women's Inequality News Articles from 2018 2nd Half